| Location:
Harris County, Texas
The Fred Hartman
Bridge near Baytown, Texas is currently one of only two cable-stayed bridges
in the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) inventory. Recent concerns
regarding the observed large amplitude vibration of stay-cables has prompted
a review of the in-service performance of the bridge.
The Fred Hartman
Bridge is about 2-1/2 miles (4 km) long and crosses the Houston Ship Channel
connecting Loop 201 in Baytown with State Highway 225 in LaPorte. The bridge
consists of twin decks, each approximately 78 ft (24 m) wide. The main
cable-stay unit is 2,475 ft (754 m) long and consists of five spans. The
main span length is 1,250 ft (381 m). The cable-stay unit superstructure
consists of steel girders, transverse floor beams, and a composite concrete
deck. The 192 stay-cables project in a fanned configuration from each side
of four diamond shaped concrete towers and attach to the outside edges
of the bridge decks. The bridge was opened to service in 1995.
Large amplitude
stay-cable vibrations have been observed numerous times at the Fred Hartman
Bridge, usually during a rain storm with relatively low winds. This phenomenon
has been called rain-wind induced vibration, or just rain vibration, and
has been observed on many cable-stayed bridges around the world. Approximately
100 welds connecting the steel stay transition pipes to the superstructure
are known to have cracked or failed, presumably from large amplitude, low
cycle fatigue caused by the vibrating cables. The large amplitude vibrations,
transition pipe weld failures, and concerns regarding the durability of
the stay-cable strands and corrosion protection grout prompted TXDOT to
initiate an evaluation and repair of the bridge. |
|
Client:
Texas Department of Transportation
The evaluation
consisted of several components including a design/construction document
review, literature review, aerodynamic analysis, dynamic response analysis,
component analysis, failure analysis, wind tunnel or flow chamber evaluation,
field monitoring, field evaluations, and the development of various repair
options. The repair options produced by WDP consisted of:
-
Restraining the
stays with restrainer cables
-
Providing additional
damping to the stays via the use of viscous dampers
-
Use of aerodynamic
dampers along the stays

The evaluation
was performed as a team effort between WDP, TxDOT, and several universities.
WDP had the lead role acting as program manager and performing many evaluation
tasks and nondestructive testing.
Services
WDP used on this project included:
-
Vibration Testing
-
Fatigue Assessment
-
Dynamic Response
Analysis
-
Repair Recommendations
and Design
-
Development and
Evaluation of Repair Options
-
Program Management
|